论文部分内容阅读
震惊世界的康菲漏油事故,造成了我国6200平方公里海水污染,对渤海地区海洋生物造成严重影响,随之而来的是清污活动、责任追究、损害赔偿等一系列善后工作。由于提起公益诉讼的相关主体难以明确,在损害赔偿上普通公民维权困难,凸显出我国海洋污染公益性救济机制的乏力。本文以此为切入点,探究海洋污染公益诉讼的原告资格认定及其顺位关系,从而更好地推动我国海洋环境保护,维护国家和公民的合法权益。
ConocoPhillips oil spill that shocked the world caused 6,200 square kilometers of seawater pollution in our country and seriously affected the marine life in the Bohai Sea area, followed by a series of aftermaths such as clean-up activities, accountability and damages. As it is difficult to clarify the relevant subjects involved in public interest litigation, ordinary citizens’ rights protection in damages is not clear, which highlights the weakness of China’s public welfare relief mechanism for marine pollution. This article takes this as an entry point to explore the plaintiff’s qualification of the public welfare litigation of the marine pollution and its rank relationship so as to better promote the marine environment protection in our country and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the country and the citizens.