作为法解释目标的法律意旨,究竟应是立法者制定法律规范时的主观意思,抑或应是存在于法律规范的客观意思,法解释学者从来聚讼纷纭,并形成主观解释论与客观解释论的对立。按照19世纪的主观解释论,“法律解释的目标,在于探求立法者在制定法律当时事实上的意思。这意思是心理学意义上的东西。因此,旧主观说又称为立法者意思说”。按照客观说,法律一经制定,即从立法者分离,成为 Whether the legal intention of legal interpretation as the goal should be the subjective meaning when the legislator formulates the legal norms or the objective meaning that exists in the legal norms, the legal interpreter scholars have different opinions and form the subjective interpretation and the objective interpretation opposition. According to the nineteenth-century subjective interpretation theory, “the goal of legal interpretation is to seek the de facto meanings of the legislator at the time of enactment of the law, which means something in the psychological sense.” Therefore, the old subjective theory is also called the legislator’s meaning ". According to the objective theory, once the law has been formulated, it is separated from the legislator