论文部分内容阅读
近些年来,国内的艺术评论一直把艺术归结为对生活的反映、对生活的本质和规律的概括和提炼;然而,改革大潮的涌来。特别是一批“为艺术而艺术”的艺术家对“生活”的背离,使艺术像一群脱缰之马,沿着漫无定格的道路,走出来了无数的个性形式—一让大家耳目一新、叹为观止!惊诧之余,百般反思,不禁对生活与艺术审美结构的一致性产生了极大的怀疑!曾记得,美学大师黑格尔与车尔尼雪夫斯基关于“美在艺术”还是“美在生活”就有过长期的误会和争执!那么,生活与艺术的审美本质,究竟有何差异
In recent years, the domestic art criticism has always referred to the art as a reflection of life, the generalization and refinement of the essence and regularity of life; however, the tide of reform came. In particular, the departure of a group of artists who “art for art” from “life” made art run like a ream of horses along innumerable paths and innumerable forms of personality - a refreshing and breathtaking view Astonishing aside, all kinds of introspection, can not help but have a great doubts about the consistency of the aesthetic structure of life and art! Have remembered, the aesthetics master Hegel and Chernyshevsky on “beauty in art” or “beauty in Life ”has had long-term misunderstanding and dispute! Then, the aesthetic nature of life and art, what is the difference