论文部分内容阅读
我在写完《略论唐墓志书法的历史地位》(1993年《书法艺术》第3期刊发)一文后,深感有不尽如意之处。后在写《读唐墓志丛札》的过程中,又阅读了不少唐墓志,也细心地寻思了这些唐墓志的书法艺术,便产生了弥补不足的念头。于是,在翻阅了一些参考资料后,完成了这篇《唐墓志书法的再认识》。不妥之处,恳请指正。(一)我国的书法艺术遗产十分浩繁,品类很多,墓志便是其中很丰富的一类。西安碑林收藏
After I finished writing “A Brief Comment on the Historical Status of Calligraphy in Tang Dynasty” (Issue 3, Calligraphy Art, 1993), I feel deeply unpleasant. Later in the process of writing “Collections of Congratulations on the Tomb of the Tang Dynasty,” they also read many epitaphs of the Tang Dynasty and also carefully thought about the calligraphic art of these tombs of the Tang Dynasty. This gave rise to the idea of making up for the deficiencies. So, after reading some reference materials, completed this “re-understanding of the tomb calligraphy.” Inappropriate, please correct me. (A) China’s calligraphy art heritage is very voluminous, many categories, epitaph is one of a very rich category. Xi’an Forest of Stone Tablets collection