一、前言几乎没有人认为汉斯·凯尔森在法律解释方面做的是最好的。从凯尔森关于解释的论述来看,他似乎更倾向于法律认知,并将其作为代替传统法理学方法的一种手段。在一篇重要的论文中,他采取一种完全不同的策略,即将关于解释的原则紧密地与基础规范联系在一起。在他最早的著作里,凯尔森拒绝使用心理学上的立法者“意志”这一概念,这种拒斥可以被认为是他在法律解释方面对意向论的反对。然而,与解释纠缠在一起的是对凯 I. Preface Few people think that Hans Kelsen is the best at legal interpretation. From Kelsen’s explanation of explanation, he seems to be more inclined to legal cognition as a means of replacing traditional jurisprudence. In an important essay, he adopted a completely different strategy of closely relating the principle of interpretation to the basic norms. In his earliest work, Kelsen refuses to use the concept of psychological legislator, “Will,” which can be considered as his opposition to the theory of intentionality in terms of legal interpretation. However, entangled with the explanation is Kai