论文部分内容阅读
纯粹经济损失作为一个横跨侵权法与契约法边界的概念,具有明显的独立性、无形性和不利益性。它不仅反映了对受害人经济利益的一种救济保护,在更多的情况下还要求加强对第三人利益的保护。不同国家在纯粹经济损失是否赔付以及赔付范围的限制等问题上争议颇大,我国也只在特殊情况下对纯粹经济损失进行赔付。为弥补第三人纯粹经济损失的法律制度漏洞,通过借鉴欧美发达国家的先进立法与处理手段,对建立我国的第三人纯粹经济损失赔付制度进行探讨。
As a concept of transboundary tort and contractual law, pure economic loss has obvious independence, invisibility and non-profitability. It not only reflects a relief protection for the economic interests of the victims, but also requires more protection of the interests of third parties in more cases. Different countries have been disputed over the issue of whether the purely economic losses can be paid or not, as well as the limits on the scope of reimbursement. Our country only pays for purely economic losses under special circumstances. In order to make up for the loopholes in the legal system of the pure economic loss of the third party, this paper explores the establishment of the system of the third party pure economic loss compensation in our country by referring to the advanced legislation and handling methods of the developed countries in Europe and the United States.