文章就北京市高级人民法院“一种聊天机器人系统”无效终审判决中关于“公开不充分”的“足够明确的指引”这一判断标准进行了深入分析,探讨该判断标准是否会与现行的《专利法》《专利审查指南》的衡量标准不一致,导致专利审批部门与法院就“公开不充分”这一问题产生不同的判断结果。 The article carries on an in-depth analysis on the judgment standard of “sufficiently explicit guideline” for “openly inadequate ” in Beijing Higher People’s Court “a chatting robot system Whether it will be inconsistent with the current ”Patent Law“ ”Guidelines for Patent Examination Guidelines“, resulting in different judgments on the part between patent examination and approval authorities and courts on the issue of ”insufficient publicity."