论文部分内容阅读
目的分析比较温州各县(市、区)疾控中心在2011年与2015年人力资源现状,为今后人力资源建设提供科学依据。方法收集2011年、2015年温州县区级疾控中心人力资源状况(包括年龄、工作年限、专业、学历、职称等方面)进行分析比较,采用χ~2对比。结果共调查温州市11个县(市、区)疾控中心的2011年在职人员539人,2015年在职人员656人。年龄以25~45岁青壮年为主,工作年限均以10~19年居多,专业以公共卫生为主,学历以本科为主,职称以初级为主;同年龄相比:25~34岁年龄组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),35~44岁年龄组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),同专业相比:公共卫生专业和检验专业差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),同学历相比:本科差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),大专、中专差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),同职称相比:高级、中级、初级差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 2015年温州各县(市、区)级疾病预防控制中心人员整体素质较2011年有所提升,学历、职称、专业比例均有不同程度提高,但仍存在公共卫生专业比例不高,硕士研究生比例增加不明显,职称仍以初级为主,需要在今后人力资源配置中予以重视完善。
Objective To compare and analyze the current situation of human resources in all counties (cities, districts) in China in 2011 and 2015, and provide a scientific basis for future human resource construction. Methods The status of human resources (including age, working years, major, academic record, professional title, etc.) of Wenzhou CDC in 2011 and 2015 were analyzed and compared, using χ ~ 2 comparison. Results A total of 539 employees were enrolled in 2011 from 11 counties (cities and districts) in Wenzhou City. In 2015, there were 656 serving staff. Age of 25 to 45 years of young and middle-aged, working years are mostly 10 to 19 years, professional public health-based, academic mainly undergraduate, primary title primary; compared with the same age: 25 to 34 years of age (P <0.01). There was significant difference between the age group of 35-44 years (P <0.05). Compared with the specialty, there was significant difference between the public health specialty and the test specialty (P <0.05) (P <0.01). There was significant difference between junior college and secondary school (P <0.05). Compared with the first grade, there was significant difference between high school, middle school and primary school (P <0.05) <0.05). Conclusion In 2015, the overall quality of CDC staff in all counties (cities and districts) in Wenzhou has been raised as compared with that in 2011, and their qualifications, titles and occupations have all improved to some extent. However, there is still a low proportion of public health professionals. The proportion of increase is not obvious, the title is still primary, you need to be in the future allocation of human resources to attach importance to perfection.