论文部分内容阅读
思维是人的一种精神实践活动,作为这种精神实践活动的结果和产物,是理论、学说和思想体系。法律思维作为现代法律科学中的一个概念,与一般的法律职业相关,它是法律职业者在长期法律实践中所形成的观察、思考、分析和判断法律问题的方式或习惯。在司法实践中,法官所作的任何裁判都是其思维活动直接作用的结果,或者说,法官的思维对案件的处理结果起着十分重要的作用。法官思维包括“根据法律的思考”和“关于法律的思考”两种法律方式。司法审判的目的是法官将法律规则适用于具体案件的活动中,寻找“什么东西值得认识”的思维所规定的。司法审判是受法官已经获得的“前见”所决定,这些“前见”规定着法官思维的质量,可以说有什么样的“前见”就有什么样的思维广度和深度。法官思维特征属于司法理念的一部分。
Thinking is a kind of spiritual practical activity of man. As the result and product of such spiritual practice, it is the theory, doctrine and ideological system. As a concept in modern legal science, legal thinking is related to general legal profession. It is the way or habit of legal professionals in observing, thinking, analyzing and judging legal problems in long-term legal practice. In judicial practice, any judgment made by a judge is the direct result of his thinking activity. Or, the judge’s thinking plays a very important role in the handling of the case. Judges’ thinking includes two kinds of legal ways: “thinking according to law” and “thinking about law”. The purpose of judicial trial is that judges apply the rules of law to the activities of specific cases and find out what they think is worth knowing. Judicial judgment is determined by the “foreseen” that the judge has already obtained. These “foreseen” prescribes the quality of the judge’s thinking and can be said to have any kind of “breadth of thought” And depth. Judges’ thinking features are part of the concept of justice.