论文部分内容阅读
关于“法律技术”的概念,学界尚没有统一的界定,但“法律技术”一词很早就在学界使用,很多学者将法律技术称为法律方法,但本文主张二者是有区别的。法律技术专门解决法的有效性问题。法律把价值问题转化为技术问题,其本身就是价值的技术化。法律技术虽然随着法律价值的变化而变化,但是两者并非总是保持一致,法律技术具有有限性。关于法律技术的外延,包含两个方面:一是法律制定中的技术,即立法技术;二是法律适用中的技术,主要是司法技术,对法律技术的研究对法律学的科学发展具有举足轻重的意义,它需要法律人坚持不懈的探索和追求。
There is no unified definition of “legal technology ”, but “legal technology ” has long been used in academia, many scholars regard legal technology as a legal method, but this paper argues that both are difference. Legal technology specifically to solve the problem of the validity of the law. The law turns the value issue into the technical one, which is itself the technicalization of value. Although the legal technique changes with the change of legal value, the two are not always the same, and the legal technique is limited. On the extension of legal technology, there are two aspects: First, the technology in law making, that is, legislative technology; second, the law applicable technology, mainly judicial technology, the study of legal technology plays an important role in the scientific development of legal science Meaning, it requires legal people to persevere in the exploration and pursuit.