论文部分内容阅读
物权法对公共利益的概念没有做出界定,基于这一概念的重要性,本文的基本主张是应当并且可以对“公共利益”做出概念界定。在此基础上,本文认为界定“公共利益”的立法模式应从主客观两种路径出发:一方面,从实体出发,说明权力的合法边界,为“公共利益”作一个成文的、客观上的界定;另一方面,从程序出发,在宪政框架下寻求适当的民主决策程序来限制权力的恣意行使。
Property law does not define the concept of public interest. Based on the importance of this concept, the basic idea of this article is that it should and can define the concept of “public interest”. On this basis, this paper argues that the legislative mode of defining the “public interest” should proceed from both the subjective and objective perspectives: on the one hand, proceeding from the entity, explaining the legal boundary of power, making a written, “public interest” Objective definition; on the other hand, proceeding from the procedure, under the framework of constitutional government to seek appropriate democratic decision-making procedures to limit the arbitrary exercise of power.