论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对22篇科技论文的深入分析,全面展示了“判断”在科技语篇中独特的语言表现形式。研究发现,科技语篇中评价的对象一般为科学研究的内容与环节,极少涉及个人品行,所以有关“社会尊严”中“韧性”的评价极为罕见。笔者对“社会认可”中“真实性”评价做了适当的拓展分析,并尝试将“适宜性”划分为“适切性”和“必要性”两部分进行深入研究,以期引起同行专家对“判断”子系统做进一步调查研究。
Through in-depth analysis of 22 scientific papers, this paper comprehensively presents the unique language expression of “judgment” in scientific discourse. The study finds that the object of evaluation in scientific discourse is generally the content and link of scientific research, and seldom involves individual conduct. Therefore, the evaluation about “social dignity ” “resilience ” is extremely rare. The author makes a proper extension analysis on the evaluation of “authenticity ” in “social recognition ”, and tries to divide “suitability ” into two parts of “appropriateness” and “necessity” Conduct in-depth study, with a view to arousing peer experts to make further investigation on the “Judgment” subsystems.