论文部分内容阅读
学术场域实际蕴含了两个社会:学者社会和学术符号社会。布迪厄关注学者社会,把符号看成学者的象征资本,从社会学角度剖析学者社会中的学科结构、学术利益和学者性向对科学研究的影响,从而探究学术场域知识生产的主观性。而本文则关注学术符号社会,以危机研究为案例,一方面把学者看作符号的生命源泉,从生物社会学角度剖析符号社会中符号的诞生、成长、竞争和繁殖,从而探究学术场域形成、发展和消亡的过程,一方面对危机研究中符号概念混乱的学术状况进行重新梳理,并试图将这些概念符号归入新的符号社会组织结构中。
The academic field actually contains two societies: the scholarly society and the academic symbolic society. Bourdieu pays attention to the society of scholars and takes symbols as the symbolic capital of scholars. From the sociological point of view, Bourdieu analyzes the subject structure, academic interests and scholarly nature of scholars in the social science to explore the subjectivity of knowledge production in the academic field. However, this article focuses on the society of academic symbols, taking crisis studies as an example. On the one hand, scholars are regarded as the source of life of symbols. From the perspective of biological sociology, the birth, growth, competition and reproduction of symbols in the symbolic society are analyzed to explore the formation of academic fields , The process of development and demise, on the one hand, the academic status of the confusion of symbols in crisis studies is re-combed, and these conceptual symbols are tried to be classified into the new symbolic social organizational structure.