论文部分内容阅读
目前我国的实定法中,存在着合同内容控制的规范群,却无法辨别其分工。运用“凭借优势地位使给付均衡严重失衡”导致悖俗、“不得违反法律禁止性规定”(内容不法)等原则对一般合同条款进行效力控制与格式条款无效审查制度的适用层次与界限为何,学界讨论中虽有提及,但语焉不详。我国的格式条款内容控制制度采是一般规定和具体类型相结合的方式,一般条款因包含存在价值填补之必要的法律概念而有别于一般法律条文,对条款进行价值填补和适用,在方法论上需另作处理。从解释论的立场出发,结合比较法的观察,厘清格式条款审查与一般合同条款审查制度的层次,分析格式条款效力控制制度的审查范围和标准,为统一法律适用提供方法论上的参考。
At present, there is a normative group controlled by the content of the contract in our actual law, but it is impossible to distinguish its division of labor. Applying the Principle of “Prohibiting Sexual Provisions by Legal Provisions” (“Illegal Content”) to Controlling the Effect of General Contract Terms and the Invalid Review Rules of Format Terms with the Principle of " What is the boundary? Although it is mentioned in the academic discussion, it is not clear. The content control system in our country adopts a combination of general provisions and specific types. The general terms differ from the general legal provisions by including the necessary legal concepts that the existent value is to be filled in, so as to fill in and apply the values to the provisions. In terms of methodology Need to be dealt with separately. From the perspective of interpretation theory, combined with the observation of comparative law, we clarify the levels of the review of the format clauses and the review of the general contract clauses, and analyze the scope and standards of the review of the regulation of the validity of the clauses in the clauses, providing a methodological reference for unifying the application of the law.