關於國學我總要談到一點,國學是三教九流無所不包,非常的廣博。可是在國學裏面它有一個主流,這個主流是儒學;儒學有一個核心,這個核心是經學。我講這個話,不是一個價值判斷,而是一個事實判斷.不研究經學,不了解經學,應該説就没有把握住我們傳統文化的主流和核心的部分。在中國的歷史上,“經”的作用與地位與“史”是不一樣的,雖然古人説,剛日讀經,柔日讀史,左經右史。可是二者在傳統文化中的地位是不一樣的。不能認爲“經”與“史”是相等的,如果説這二者是相等的, As for the Sinology, I always want to talk about it. Sinology is an all-encompassing and very extensive one. However, there is a mainstream in Guoxue, the mainstream is Confucianism; Confucianism has a core, the core is the classics. When I say this, it is not a value judgment, but a factual judgment. Without studying Confucian classics or understanding of Confucian classics, we should say that we fail to grasp the mainstream and core parts of our traditional culture. In the history of China, the role and status of the “Jing” is not the same as that of “History”, although the ancients said that they just read the Bible in the past and read the history on the soft day, and they left the right and left the rightist history. However, the status of the two in traditional culture is not the same. Can not think “” and “history ” is equal, if the two are equal,