钱穆视朱子之学为完全包含象山学在内的圆密宏大之心学 ,这是其朱子学研究的一个显著特点。这个结论虽新颖 ,却不能让人无疑。钱穆认为 ,陆学中所有而合理的 ,朱学都有 ;陆学中所有而不合理的 ,朱子则免 ,并力加驳斥 ;陆学没有的 ,朱学也有。故朱子可包象山。钱穆对朱子中和说前后曲折进行了考释。又力斥王阳明朱子晚年定论之非 ,认为朱子心学中与象山相合处不是鹅湖会后朱子折从象山。本文指出 ,钱穆一味回护朱子 ,贬斥陆王 ,有过头之嫌 ,有些地方甚至已陷入他自己所竭力反对的门户意气之中而不自知。 Qian Mu as Zhu Xi’s school of thought is entirely inclusive Xiangshan Xue, including the magnanimity of the great heart, which is its Zhu Xi study of a notable feature. Although this conclusion is novel, it can not be made without doubt. Qian Mu believes that all Lu and reasonable, Zhu Xue have; Lu Xue all unreasonable, Zhu is exempt, and plus plus refuted; Lu did not, Zhu Xue also have. So Zhu can pack Xiangshan. Qian Mu Zhu Zhong said before and after the twists and turns were examined. But also denounced Wang Yangming Zhu in his later years, the conclusion of non-theory, that Zhu Xi Xinxiang and Xiangshan phase is not after the goose Lake Zhuzi off Xiangshan. This paper points out that Qian Mu blindly protects the Zhuzi and deprecates the King of Lu. It is too overdone, and some places have even fallen into the trap of his own hard-working opposition.