论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨简化后的Young养育问卷(Young Parenting Inventory-Short Form,YPI-SF)在中国正常人群中的信效度。方法:经YPI版权所属机构授权,按照跨文化修订法对YPI进行修订,YPI中文版包含72个条目,17个因子。采用方便取样入组233名成年健康人完成YPI中文版和Young图式问卷-简版(YSQ-SF)。分析YPI内部一致性,进行项目分析筛选和探索性因素分析,形成Young养育问卷中文简版(Young Parenting Inventory-Short Form,YPI-SF)。使用YSQ-SF作为效标,分析YPI-SF的校标效度。4周后随机抽取110人再次施测YPI-SF,检验重测信度。结果:YPI-SF由45个条目组成,共包括17个因子,累计贡献率74.1%。YPI-SF总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.86,分量表的α系数介于0.51~0.85之间,分量表与总量表的相关系数为0.17~0.69。YPI-SF总量表的重测信度是0.72,分量表的重测信度在0.40~0.68之间。YPI-SF与YSQ-SF总量表的相关系数是0.51(P<0.05);除IS分量表外(r=0.09,P>0.05),YPI-SF所有分量表与YSQ-SF的相关系数介于0.15~0.36之间(P<0.05)。结论:Young养育问卷中文简版在正常人中具有较好的信效度,可用于筛查图式的来源。
Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the simplified Young Parenting Inventory-Short Form (YPI-SF) in Chinese normal population. Methods: Authorized by YPI ’s copyright affiliate, YPI Chinese version contains 72 entries and 17 factors according to the Intercultural Amendment Law. A total of 233 adult healthy subjects were enrolled in the YPI Chinese and Young Schema questionnaires (YSQ-SF). Analyze the internal consistency of YPI, conduct project analysis screening and exploratory factor analysis to form Young Parenting Inventory-Short Form (YPI-SF). YSQ-SF was used as the criterion to analyze the validity of YPI-SF. After 4 weeks, 110 people were randomly selected to test YPI-SF again to test the retest reliability. Results: YPI-SF consists of 45 entries, including a total of 17 factors, the cumulative contribution rate of 74.1%. The Cronbach’s alpha of the YPI-SF total scale was 0.86, the alpha coefficient of the subscale was between 0.51 and 0.85, and the correlation coefficient between the subscales and the total scale was 0.17-0.69. The retest reliability of the YPI-SF total scale is 0.72, and the retest reliability of the subscale is between 0.40 and 0.68. The correlation coefficient between YPI-SF and YSQ-SF was 0.51 (P <0.05). The correlation coefficients between YSI-SF and all subscales of YPI-SF except for IS subscales (r = 0.09, P> 0.05) Between 0.15 and 0.36 (P <0.05). Conclusion: The Young Literacy Chinese Version has a good reliability and validity in normal people and can be used to screen the origin of the schema.