论文部分内容阅读
知识产权的地域性和“特权”起源反应了国家控制经济利益的野心。在金融危机背景下,更多外国品牌进军中国市场,如何在加强本国知识产权保护的同时防范、化解侵权风险,是目前商标合理使用制度的意义所在。现行《商标法实施条例》和2007年9月出台的《商标法修改草稿》(征求意见稿)对叙述性合理使用作了规定,但在司法实践中,企业名称、域名权、商标权与商标权发生冲突时也得以合理使用作为侵权抗辩提出。
The geographical and intellectual “origin” of intellectual property reflects the ambition of the state to control economic interests. In the context of financial crisis, more foreign brands enter the Chinese market. How to prevent and resolve the infringement risks while strengthening the protection of their own intellectual property rights is the significance of the current system of fair use of trademarks. The current Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law and the Draft Amendment to the Trademark Law promulgated in September 2007 provide for the narrative and rational use, but in judicial practice, the business name, domain name right, trademark right and trademark The conflict of rights can also be reasonably used as infringement defense.