论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】对于概然性教唆,由于教唆犯的教唆内容比较笼统、不太明确,因此,即使发生基本犯罪构成要件之外的加重结果,亦应认定未超出教唆犯的教唆范围,教唆犯应与其他实行共犯时该加重结果承担共同罪责,但对教唆犯的具体量刑应根据其在共同犯罪中的作用进行考量。那种认为教唆犯即是主犯的观点,不符合罪责刑相适应的原则,司法实践中应根据教唆犯在共同犯罪中的地位、作用对教唆犯的主从犯地位加以客观认定。
As for the summary abetment, since the abetting elements of abettors are rather general and not clear enough, even if the aggravating result other than the basic crime elements should be aggravated, abettors should not be found beyond the scope of abettor’s abetting The exacerbation should bear common culpability with other accomplice. However, the specific sentencing of abettor should be based on its role in joint crime. The view that the abettor is the principal culprit does not accord with the principle of adapting crime and punishment. According to the status and role of the abettor in the crime of common offense, the judicial practice should objectively identify the principal and the accomplice status of the abettor.