论文部分内容阅读
我打算扼要地论述的这个问题当然是复杂而难以说清的,它特别容易引起认识论上的误解和解释学上的混乱。为了尽力避开这些陷井,就应该确定某些基本的界限,重申社会学分析方法的某些起码常识。谁都不否认,社会学自从登上欧洲工业社会的知识舞台以来,就不断地申明它的科学使命(往往是以独有的和断然的方式),要求有权描述和解释使人类社会能够思考、说话、工作以及按照某些忽明忽暗的过程造成和再现
Of course, the issue that I intend to outline briefly is complex and difficult to explain. It is particularly apt to cause epistemological misunderstandings and hermeneutic chaos. To try to avoid these pitfalls, some basic boundaries should be identified, reaffirming some of the common sense of sociological analysis. There is no denying that sociology has constantly affirmed its scientific mission (often in a unique and categorical manner) since its ascension on the intellectual stage of European industrial society, demanding the right to describe and explain the ways in which human society can think , Speaking, working, and following certain flickering processes