论文部分内容阅读
随着书法热潮的推进,“书学”一词被广泛使用,但“书学”概念和研究范畴皆没有准确界定。期间虽不乏言论,然其界定依据不明。笔者以为“书学”概念并非简单的定义问题,势必需要梳理书法类文献①在古代官修史书分类中的所属情况,以古为例客观分析传统“书学”的概念和研究范畴。此间文献学科的参与不可回避。本文拟说明书法类文献在古代官修目录书中之所属情况,尝试界定“书学”的概念与研究
With the advent of calligraphy craze, the term “book learning” is widely used, but the concepts and research categories of “book learning” are not precisely defined. Although there is no lack of speech during the period, its definition is not clear. I think “book study ” concept is not a simple definition of the problem, it is bound to sort out the calligraphy literature ① in ancient official history books classified in the case, the ancient example of an objective analysis of the traditional “book” concept and research category. The participation of literature disciplines here can not be avoided. This article intends to explain the law literature in the ancient official catalog directory belongs to the case, trying to define the concept and research