论文部分内容阅读
义和团运动直至新中国的历史中,1902—1921年可视为一个司法时期。民国初年的司法现实承袭自清末的司法改革,但有新的突破;“司法界组党”“火烧刑部档案”“中央司法会议”等事件表征了民国的“司法革命”。然而,谋求“中央集权”的政府借故出台了“裁减法官”的政策,不料造成了“法官罢工”的后果。质言之,民国司法的进程问题,很大程度上是政治与司法之间的“协作”关系出了问题,从而造就了法院的“无足轻重”。因此,政治与司法协作的良好机制,再加上司法的价值与有效性,可能是民国司法“举足轻重”的必要条件。
The Boxers Up until the history of New China, 1902-1921 can be regarded as a period of justice. The judicial reality in the early years of the Republic of China inherited the judicial reform from the late Qing Dynasty, but there were new breakthroughs. The “judicial party”, “the files of the criminal files”, “the central judicial conference” revolution“. However, the government that sought ”centralized power“ promulgated the policy of ”reducing judges“ and unexpectedly caused the consequence of ”judge strike“. In essence, the question of the process of judicial administration in the Republic of China is largely a matter of ”cooperation“ between politics and justice, thus creating the ”insignificance“ of the courts. Therefore, the sound mechanism of political and judicial cooperation, together with the value and effectiveness of the judiciary, may be the necessary condition for the judiciary in the Republic of China to be ”pivotal".