论文部分内容阅读
《人民司法》1987年第7期发表的《这起“奖券”纠纷应如何处理?》一文认为,购买“奖券”的彭某无权要求张某返还彩电。笔者对此意见不敢苟同,特撰此文,谈谈我们的意见。我们认为,中奖彩电应归彭某所有。理由是,首先,从民事权利方面看。彭某购买的有奖票券中所载的看球权和可能中奖权是可以分离的。大家知道,民事权利是公民在具体的民事法律关系中,依照法律的规定或者合同的约定,根据自己的意愿实现自己的某种利益的权利。本案中,彭某在新华路体育场购买有奖票券后,就同时享有了看球权和可能中奖权。根
“People's Justice” in 1987 the seventh issue of the “this” lottery “dispute should be how to deal with?” The text that buy “lottery” Pengmou no right to ask Zhang to return the color TV. I disagree with this opinion, essay this article, to talk about our opinions. We think the winning color TV belongs to Pengmou. The reason is, first of all, from the perspective of civil rights. Pengmou purchase tickets in the tickets contained in the ball may be won and the right to be able to win the separation. We all know that civil rights are the citizens' rights to realize one's own interests according to their own wishes in accordance with the stipulations of laws or contracts. In this case, Pengmou purchased a prize ticket at Xinhua Road Stadium and enjoyed both the right to watch and the possible win. root