论文部分内容阅读
行政垄断是因国家行政权力的滥用,而造成限制竞争、排斥竞争的一种垄断现象。行政垄断因其发生的原因,其危害甚于其他垄断行为。故此,行政垄断受到各国反垄断法的禁止。2007年颁布的《中华人民共和国反垄断法》更是专章规制行政垄断。虽然《反垄断法》对行政垄断作出了规制,但是呈现手段单一,内容模糊等不足。欧美和日本的反垄断法有较为成熟多样的规制方法。因此本文试图通过对行政垄断的学理研究并结合欧美、日本等国的反垄断法的规定,简单要地阐述关于规制我国行政垄断的方法。
Administrative monopoly is a kind of monopoly phenomenon that restricts competition and excludes competition because of abuse of administrative power of the state. Administrative monopolies are more harmful than other monopolies because of their causes. Therefore, the administrative monopoly by the anti-monopoly law banned. The “Antitrust Law of the People’s Republic of China” promulgated in 2007 is a special monopoly on administrative monopoly. Although the Anti-monopoly Law regulates the administrative monopoly, it presents a single means and the content is fuzzy. The antitrust laws of Europe, the United States and Japan have more mature and diversified regulatory methods. Therefore, this article attempts to elaborate the method of regulating the administrative monopoly in our country through the study of administrative monopoly and the anti-monopoly law of Europe, the United States, Japan and other countries.