论文部分内容阅读
我国著作权保护遵循自动产生原则,但著作权所涉领域的特性又需要行政许可对作品内容进行合法性审查,从而导致行政许可与著作权保护的交叉博弈,给行政和司法实践造成困惑。基于行政许可的限权性质,单纯的著作权纠纷不属于行政许可的审查范围,行政许可机关在对作品进行审查时,应对所涉著作权纠纷遵循谦抑原则,著作权人也应对其行政救济权利进行谦抑性选择;在著作权司法保护中,对未经审批作品的侵权责任的认定,法院也应根据行政许可的不同情形区别采纳,而行政许可机关对于法院生效裁判的协助执行也应依其权责范围而定。
The copyright protection in our country follows the principle of automatic generation. However, the characteristics of the area covered by copyright also require the administrative license to examine the legitimacy of the content of the work, leading to the cross-game between administrative license and copyright protection, which creates confusion for administrative and judicial practice. Based on the limited right nature of administrative licensing, pure copyright disputes do not belong to the scope of the administrative license examination. When examining the work, the administrative licensing authority should follow the modest principle of copyright disputes and the copyright owner should also exercise the right of administrative remedy In the judicial protection of copyrights, the court should also distinguish and adopt according to the different circumstances of the administrative license, and the administrative licensing organ should also act according to its rights and responsibilities for the enforcement of the court adjudication. Depending on the scope.