一、对律师公开言论进行规制的理由经过几个世纪的纷争,关于律师是否和普通民众一样享有宪法规定的言论自由这一问题的争论已经尘埃落定。律师言论属于宪法言论自由的例外情形,原则上不受宪法言论权的保护。纵览各国,规制律师公开言论通行的三个理由如下:首先,基于维护司法公正的需要。律师作为知晓案情的代理人,对审判结果有着一定的利益关系。如 I. Rationale for Regulating Public Speeches by Lawyers After centuries of dispute, the debate over whether lawyers enjoy the same constitutional freedom of speech as the general public has been settled. Lawyers’ speech belongs to the exception of freedom of speech in the Constitution, and is not protected by the right of constitutional interpretation in principle. Throughout each country, the three reasons for regulating the public speech and passage of lawyers are as follows: First, based on the need to safeguard judicial justice. As an agent who knows the case, a lawyer has a certain interest in the outcome of the trial. Such as