论文部分内容阅读
目的比较高频电刀与氩气刀治疗消化道息肉的效果。方法对我院收治的60例共120枚消化道息肉患者随机分为两组，分别采用内镜下氩气刀和高频电刀治疗，对手术时间、手术效果、术中和术后并发症及术后病变残留、复发情况进行分析。结果采用内镜下高频电刀切除及高频氩离子切除消化道息肉均一次性切除，成功率均达到了100%。高频电刀与高频氩气刀治疗较小消化道息肉时出血、穿孔、腹痛等并发症均少，无明显差异。结论高频电刀与氩气刀治疗较小消化道息肉时出血、穿孔、腹痛等并发症均少，无明显差异，但因氩气刀设备价格昂贵，而前者的价格，较低廉，适合基层医院使用。“,”Objective To compare the high-frequency electrotome and argon knife for the treatment of gastrointestinal polyps.Methods 60 cases of our hospital,a total of 120 patients with digestive tract polyps were randomly divided into two groups,respectively treated by endoscopic argon knife and high frequency electric knife,the operation time,surgical effect,intraoperative and postoperative complications and recurrence of postoperative residual lesion,situation is analyzed.Results Endoscopic resection of the high frequency electricity knife and high frequency argon ion removal of digestive tract polyps are one-time excision,the success rate reached 100%.High frequency electric knife and the high frequency argon knife treatment of minor gastrointestinal polyp complications such as hemorrhage,perforation,abdominal pain,were less,no obvious difference.Conclusion High-frequency electrotome and argon knife the treatment of minor gastrointestinal polyp complications such as hemorrhage,perforation,abdominal pain,were less,no obvious difference,but because of argon knife equipment is expensive,and the price of the former,relatively cheap,suitable for primary hospitals.