本文旨在探讨邓正来先生所提出的建构世界正当秩序的话语争夺问题。本文认为,此种以话语争夺为基础的路径必然要预设一种超国家的权威,或者说一种全球层面上的政治决断论;而如果不采取此种立场的话,那么从更为现实的角度上看,也必须预设一种国家的资格理论,也就是说,与罗尔斯的“正派的国家”和康德的“共和制”一样,对参与全球治理的主体资格作出某种限定,从而保证在一种理性对话的过程中解决冲突、达成共识。 The purpose of this article is to explore the issue of discourse contention proposed by Mr. Deng Zhenglai for building a just world order. This article argues that this kind of path based on discourse contention necessarily presupposes a supranational authority or a political determinism on a global level. If this position is not taken, then from a more realistic From the angle of view, it is also necessary to set a national qualification theory. That is to say, like Rawls’s “Real State” and Kant’s “Republicanism,” the main qualifications of participation in global governance So as to ensure that conflicts can be resolved and consensus reached during a rational dialogue.