论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较胺碘酮与西地兰治疗阵发性室上性心动过速的疗效。方法将选择的63例室上性心律失常患者随机分为二组,胺碘酮组32例和西地兰组31例,对比两种药物的有效转复率,转复时间及不良反应。结果胺碘酮转复率高于西地兰(P<0.05)转复时间胺碘酮比西地兰长。两组均无明显不良反应。
Objective To compare the efficacy of amiodarone and cedilanol in the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Methods Sixty-three patients with supraventricular arrhythmias were randomly divided into two groups: 32 cases in amiodarone group and 31 cases in cedilanid group. The effective recovery rate, recovery time and adverse reactions of the two drugs were compared. Results The amiodarone recovery rate was higher than that of cedilanid (P <0.05). Amiodarone was longer than cedilanid. No significant adverse reactions in both groups.