论文部分内容阅读
中国的《反垄断法》是在借鉴欧盟竞争法的立法蓝本上形成的,其在实施中还是具有欧盟竞争法的影子,美国反托拉斯法的影响是根深蒂固的。在中国的近期,在相关反垄断的案件中,可以看出反垄断法与美国反托拉斯法之间的冲突性。错误的成本分析框架能够在一定程度上为不同法律体系作出合理的解释,分析二者之间存在的差异,并能够分析在不同的制度下应该选择哪种法律。错误成本分析框架是在分析市场中的假阳性和假阴性的基础上,分析市场是否可以自行地扭转错误,是否具有自我修复的能力,对这些假设的探究能够对中国的反垄断法进行新的认识。
China’s “Anti-Monopoly Law” is formed on the basis of the legislative blueprint borrowing from the EU competition law. It still has the shadow of the EU competition law in its implementation. The impact of the U.S. antitrust law is deeply rooted. In China’s recent antitrust cases, we can see the conflict between the antitrust law and the U.S. antitrust law. The wrong cost analysis framework can reasonably explain different legal systems to some extent, analyze the differences between the two, and analyze which laws should be chosen under different systems. Based on the analysis of false positives and false negatives in the market, the analysis framework of error costs analyzes whether the market can reverse mistakes on its own and whether it has the ability to repair itself. The exploration of these hypotheses can make a new study on China’s antitrust law understanding.