论文部分内容阅读
与英美法系国家判例有一定类比性但却极具中国特色的案例指导制度,是我国司法探索的又一大创新。案例指导制度创设的根本意图在于规范法官自由裁量权,实现司法统一,增加司法效益,更好的保障公平正义。但案例指导制度的双刃性决定它的实施并不会一帆风顺,虽然尚未暴露出太多缺陷,其潜在的负面因素却不容我们忽视。所以,对待案例指导制度,必须辅以其它的制度以规范适用。否则,非但无法实现案例指导制度设计的初衷,反而会阻碍我国的法治化建设,我们要耐心的期待它在实践中走向成熟。
The case guidance system which has a certain analogy with the precedents of Anglo-American legal system but is very Chinese in character is another great innovation of our country’s judicial exploration. The basic intent of creating the case guidance system lies in standardizing judges’ discretion, realizing judicial unity, enhancing judicial efficiency and better guaranteeing fairness and justice. However, the duality of the case guidance system determines that its implementation will not be easy. Although it has not revealed too many defects, its potential negative factors can not be ignored by us. Therefore, treat the case guidance system must be supplemented by other systems to regulate the application. Otherwise, not only failing to realize the original intention of design of case guidance system will hinder the construction of our country’s rule of law, we should patiently expect it to mature in practice.