论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志: 您好!《海洋技术》杂志以新的面貌与读者见面了,作为一个海洋技术工作者,我为此感到由衷的高兴,从已出版的三期看来,刊物从内容到形式,均较前《海洋仪器》有新的转变。题材的范围宽泛了。作者的面更广了,版面也新颖了。特别是第三期“新盐标专辑”,刊登了一些重要的评介文章以及大量的背景材料,为读者们学习和应用1978年实用盐标创造了有利条件。本刊的不足之处,我以为有以下几点:(1)大块文章稍多一些。在第一期中,正文79页,7篇长文章即占60页。中短篇文章过少,这是在编排上呆板,单调的原因之一,在这方面,美刊《Sea Technology》可供借鉴。该刊的特是栏目多,短文多,内容丰富,文图并茂,寓技术性与动态性于一体。当然,该刊广告过
Editor’s Comrade: Hello! OceanTec Magazine met the reader with a new look. As a marine technologist, I am very pleased to see this. According to the three published issues, the contents of the publication from the content to the form, All have new changes to the former “marine instruments.” The range of topics is broad. The author’s face wider, the layout is also novel. In particular, the third issue of “New Salt Standard Album,” published a number of important review articles and a large amount of background material, creating favorable conditions for readers to learn and apply the 1978 practical salt standard. The shortcomings of this issue, I think the following points: (1) a little larger piece of the article. In the first issue, there are 79 pages in the main text, and 7 long articles make up 60 pages. Too few short and medium articles, which is dull and monotonous in the layout of one of the reasons, in this regard, the United States published “Sea Technology” for reference. The special section is more columns, short essays, rich in content, illustrated, combines technical and dynamic in one. Of course, the magazine advertised