近期,有两则新闻几乎同时占据了媒体版面:陕西宝鸡“领取结婚证时都应无偿献血一次”与浙江浦江“父母献血孩子能中考加分”。这都是为了督促人们去献血。可真有用吗?超人一世代:其实无非就是一次“懒政”式的解决方案罢了,有没有效果并不关键,只求显得自己做了事而已。在采集和制作的成本不公开,献血后补偿使用方式麻烦无保障、领导和专业人士也懒得出去做表率和示范的情况下,无论采取何种看上去很奇葩的“优惠”政策,也无法改变血荒的局面,因为连基 Recently, there are two news accounts occupy the media almost at the same time layout: Shaanxi Baoji “should receive a blood donation when a marriage certificate should be ” and Zhejiang Pujiang “parents blood donation in the exam plus score ”. This is to urge people to donate blood. Is it really useful? Superman a generation: in fact, nothing more than a “lazy governance” type of solution nothing more, there is no effect is not the key, just to show what they have done. No matter which kind of seemingly exotic “preferential” policy is adopted, the cost of collection and production is not disclosed, the way of compensatory use of donated blood is inconvenient and the leaders and professionals are too lazy to go out to do the exemplary work and demonstration. Can not change the blood shortage situation, because even base