论文部分内容阅读
在否定或贬低中国悲剧存在的各种倾向中,完全忽视中西悲剧所具有的共同特征而无限夸大中西悲剧的差异的倾向也是相当突出的。在2004年《文艺研究》第3期上。黄克剑以“悲’从何来?”为题在比较中西悲剧时就是只看到了中西悲剧的差异,而没有看到中西悲剧的共同特征。1975年,在《淡江评论》第6—7卷第1期上,姚一苇在探讨元杂剧中悲剧观时指出:“悲剧不曾产生于中国。”这有两个原因:第一,西方悲剧实起源于对神的
Among the various tendencies that negate or belittle the existence of Chinese tragedies, it is quite remarkable that they completely ignore the common features of the tragedies in China and the West and indefinitely exaggerate the differences between the tragedies in China and the West. In 2004 “literature and art research” the third period. Huang Kejian to “sad” come from? “In the comparison of the tragedy of China and the West, only saw the difference between the tragedy of China and the West, but did not see the common tragedy of the West. In 1975, during the first phase of the 6-7 issue of ”The Review of the Taojiang River,“ Yao Yiwei pointed out in the discussion of the tragedy in the Yuanza dramas: ”The tragedies did not originate in China." There are two reasons: first Western tragedies actually originated from God