论文部分内容阅读
在行政诉讼中,作为被告的代理律师是否享有调查、取证权,对这个问题,在理论和实践中,目前的看法不尽一致,关键是对我国行政诉讼法中有关规定的不同认识和理解,主要有四种观点:一、认为在行政诉讼中,作为被告代理人的律师不享有调查、取证权;二、认为可以补证,即律师可以通过调查,补充一些能证明具体行政行为合法性的材料;三、认为被告的代理律师能否取证要看具体情况,主要证据不足的不得取证,一般的问题可以调查和取证;四、认为行政诉讼法中被告代理律师享
In the administrative litigation, as the defendant’s attorney whether to enjoy the right to investigate and obtain evidence, the current views in theory and practice are not the same in this issue. The key point is the different understanding and understanding of the relevant provisions in China’s Administrative Procedure Law, There are four main points: First, that in the administrative proceedings, as a lawyer defendant agents do not have the investigation, the right to take evidence; Second, that can complement evidence that lawyers can be investigated through the investigation, to add some proof of the legitimacy of specific administrative acts Materials; 3, that the defendant’s attorney can obtain evidence depends on the specific circumstances, the main lack of evidence can not get evidence, the general problems can be investigated and evidence; Fourth, that the lawsuit in the administrative litigation lawyer attorney