论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究妊娠高血压疾病的分类标准和临床诊治进展。方法:比较国际妊娠高血压疾病分类标准与我国妊娠高血压疾病分类标准的不同之处,并加以分析。结果:经测量血压<140/90mmHg非诊断标准,水肿也非诊断标准,测量尿蛋白(+)属于诊断标准。结论:现代化临床诊断分类标准更能全面监测孕妇重要脏器功能的损伤程度以及胎儿功能的实际情况,这对于妊娠高血压的临床诊治来说具有至关重要的作用和意义。
Objective: To study the classification criteria of pregnancy-induced hypertension and clinical diagnosis and treatment progress. Methods: To compare the difference between the international classification of pregnancy-induced hypertension and our country’s classification of pregnancy-induced hypertension, and to analyze. Results: The measured blood pressure <140 / 90mmHg non-diagnostic criteria, edema is not diagnostic criteria, urinary protein (+) is a diagnostic criteria. Conclusion: The modern clinical diagnostic classification standard can comprehensively monitor the degree of injury of vital organs in pregnant women and the actual situation of fetal function, which plays a crucial role in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension.