论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,我国宪法学的主流理论认为,全国人大常委会是我国的宪法审查机关,它根据宪法第67条第(1)项的授权,排他性地从事宪法解释活动,或至多承认全国人大自身的宪法解释权。这样的思维遮蔽了一个事实:无论一国的立法机关是否是宪法审查机关,无论它是否获得宪法的明文授权,其职权的行使都具备宪法解释的功能,即实际上从事一种“功能”意义上的宪法解释活动。立法机关行使职权的行为之所以在功能意义上具备宪法解释的属性,是因为其在行
For a long time, the mainstream theory of constitutional law in our country holds that the NPCSC is the constitutional review organ of our country. According to Article 67 (1) of the Constitution, it is exclusively engaged in constitutional interpretation activities or at most recognizes the NPC’s own The power of constitutional interpretation. Such thinking obscures the fact that no matter whether the legislature of a country is the organ of constitutional review or not, regardless of whether it obtains the express constitutional authorization or not, the exercise of its functions and powers has the function of constitutional interpretation, that is, practically engaging in a “function” Meaning of constitutional interpretation activities. The reason why the acts exercised by the legislature in the functional sense is constitutional interpretation is that the reason