论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,中国大陆地区的辛亥革命及南京临时政府历史人物研究,由于很大程度上受到对于孙中山和黄兴两位革命领袖间的不同政见的误解而产生的所谓“孙派”和“黄派”的传统学术观点的影响,造成了对于中国同盟会发起人之一、武昌首义及南京临时政府所谓“黄派”二号人物李书城的公允评价问题上的障碍,其结果导致了有关李书城这位辛亥风云人物的研究在大陆地区一直处于史不清人不名的境遇,其科研水平甚至滞后于中国台港澳地区本文以充分的论据回答了李书城在辛亥革命及其南京临时政府历史研究中究竟应取何种地位,以及李在辛亥革命及南京临时政府历史研究中究竟应予何种评价才不失之为公允的问题并在此基础上梳理出“黄派”二号人物李书城之所以缺失公允评价的三个复杂因素:一是史学界对于孙黄政见分歧的误解;二是无党派民主人士历史研究的结构性缺失;三是李书城本人恪守不为个人写史立传的初衷
For a long time, the study of the 1911 revolution in mainland China and the historical figures of the interim government in Nanjing were largely influenced by the so-called “Sunpai” and “Sunpaw” leaps and bounds in the misunderstanding of dissent between the two revolutionary leaders of Sun Yat-sen and Huang Hsing. The influence of the traditional academic viewpoint of “Huangpai” caused the obstacle to the fair evaluation of one of the sponsors of the League of China, Wuchang, and the so-called “Huangpai ” No. 2 character in the Nanjing Provisional Government. Led to the study of the book of literary figures of Li Shucheng in mainland China has been in a history of ignorance, the level of their research lags behind in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao This article with sufficient arguments to answer Li Shucheng in the Revolution of 1911 and its What position should be taken in the historical study of Nanjing Provisional Government and what kind of evaluation should be made by Li in the 1911 Revolution and the historical study of Nanjing Provisional Government should not be regarded as an issue of fairness on the basis of which the " The reason why the second character Li Shucheng lacks the three complicated factors of fair evaluation is that one is the misunderstanding of the disagreements between Sun Huang and the political circles in history; Lack of structural studies; Third, Li Shucheng I do not adhere to the original intention of writing a personal history of biography