论文部分内容阅读
近年来，国内掀起一股为方伯谦翻案热。郑守正先生的《再论方伯谦被杀是冤案》一文是翻案文章中颇具代表性之作，但该文所提出的“方之冤案已划下了句号”、“济远舰始终在战场上与敌舰作战”等说法，缺乏根据，纯属无稽之谈。该文对所据史料不加辨析，且随意增删改窜，无所顾忌，实有悖于学术规范，称不上一篇严肃的学术文章。历史结论要靠确凿的史实，翻案更需要充分的证据，就现有史料看，尚无充分证据为方伯谦翻案。
In recent years, a wave of controversy has been set off for Fang Boqian in China. Zheng Shouzheng’s article “Fang Fangqian murdered again is a case of injustice” is the representative of the verdict in the article, but the article “square of injustice has been drawn to a full stop,” “Ji-Yuan ship has always been on the battlefield with Enemy ships operations ”and other arguments, lack of basis, purely nonsense. This article does not discriminate according to the historical data, and adds and deletions to change channeling, without scruples, contrary to academic norms, can not be called a serious academic article. Historical Conclusion Rely on conclusive historical facts, turn over the case more in need of adequate evidence, on the existing historical data, there is no sufficient evidence for Fong Pak-turned over the case.