论文部分内容阅读
孟森的《董小宛考》于1915年发表于《小说月报》,其本意是对史实的澄清,更是对王梦阮、沈瓶庵《红楼梦索隐》的正面抨击。这一抨击利器随着1921年胡适发表《红楼梦考证》实现了其彻底摧垮王、沈一派索隐陈说的使命。孟森的《董小宛考》一文兼具史学意义与红学意义,已被多方载入红学史,对“新红学”的建立做出了不可忽视的贡献。
Meng Sen’s “Dong Xiaowan test” was published in “Novel Monthly” in 1915. Its original meaning was to clarify the facts of the history. It even lashed out at the positive criticism of Wang Mengnuan and Shen bottlenacle “A Dream of Red Mansions”. This criticism weapon with the publication of “A Dream of Red Mansions” by Hu Shih in 1921 achieved its mission of completely destroying the king and sacking Shen. Meng Sen’s “Dong Xiaowan test” contains both historical significance and redology meaning. It has been loaded into the history of red history by many parties and made a significant contribution to the establishment of “new redology”.