论文部分内容阅读
罗登斯特莱契的这部历史论著在某种程度上对历史知识作了一种认识论的研究,并对于时下流行的史学风气,对于历史主义的前提和实践进行了批判。作者是耶路撒冷城希伯来大学的哲学教授;他把“历史上若干基本问题的辩证研究和时下若干见解的批判估价”两者成功地结合起来。他分析的问题都是古今历史家想要解决的问题:历史的主题与研究对象的关系;指向未来的过去历史过程与由现在追溯过去的历史知识的关系;客观性、因果关系、预言性、历史规律;以及历史与社会科学的关系。作者认为确定历史时代的界限是分析历史知识的中心环节,他的周密的定义对上述的那些问题颇有启
To some extent, this historical treatise of Rosenstreich makes an epistemological study of historical knowledge, and criticizes the prevailing historical culture and the preconditions and practices of historicism. The author is a professor of philosophy at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem City; he succeeded in combining “both the dialectical study of a number of fundamental questions in history and the critical appraisal of a number of opinions nowadays.” The problems he analyzed are all the questions the ancient and modern historians want to solve: the relationship between the theme of the history and the object of study; the relationship between the past history of the future pointing to the future and the historical knowledge traced back from the present; the objectivity, causality, prophecy, The law of history; and the relationship between history and social sciences. The author believes that the determination of the boundaries of the historical era is the central link in the analysis of historical knowledge, and his well-defined definition of the above problems