论文部分内容阅读
近二十年来,在大规模征地运动中被焦点放大并标签化的地方政府利维坦之恶与失地农民的弱者形象需要进行重新的经验化理解,既有的征地维权范式研究需要被重新反思。鄂中X村的调查表明,村庄征地的社会基础和征拆体制是征地研究展开的两大前提性认识,农民在征地共识指引下通过土地、房屋等物质资本和社会关系资本与地方政府进行双向多次的地权博弈,以此来完成村庄集体所有土地国有化的产权转移才是征地的基本逻辑和真实经验。征地不仅是地权博弈和产权转移的过程,征地给村庄带来了农民阶层分化的扩大、地权共识瓦解下的土地纠纷和失地的精英农户以上访进行虚假抗争等社会治理后果,在基层治理性危机突出、地方政权的治理权力和话语权力不断流失的背景下如何完成对征地的治理需要学界和政策部门加以认真反思。
In the past 20 years, the viciousness of Leviathan and the weak figure of peasants who lost their land needs to be re-empirically understood in the large-scale land acquisition campaign, which is magnified and labeled. The existing research on the paradigm of rights protection for land acquisition needs to be reconsidered . The survey of village X in Hubei shows that the social foundation and the system of requisition and demolition of villages are two preconditions for land acquisition research. Under the guidance of the requisition of land, peasants bid jointly with local governments through material capital and social capital of land, houses and so on Repeated land rights game, in order to complete the ownership of the collective ownership of the village land ownership transfer of property rights is the basic logic and real experience. Land expropriation is not only the process of land rights game and property transfer, the land acquisition has brought to the village the expansion of the peasant class differentiation, land disputes dismantled by the land rights consensus and elite peasants who have lost their land to carry out fictitious protests and other social governance consequences. How to complete the governance of land requisition under the background of continuous loss of power of local government and discourse power needs academics and policy departments to seriously reflect.