论文部分内容阅读
目的比较盆底悬吊术与经阴道子宫切除治疗盆底障碍性疾病的临床效果。方法将我院住院治疗的盆底障碍性疾病患者70例分为悬吊组和切除组各35例。悬吊组采用盆底悬吊术治疗,切除组采用经阴道子宫切除治疗。结果悬吊组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后导尿时间、住院天数以及术后1年的复发率等均明显优于切除组。结论盆底悬吊术与经阴道子宫切除相比,在治疗盆底障碍性疾病疗效更加明显,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of pelvic floor suspension and transvaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of pelvic floor disease. Methods 70 patients with pelvic floor disease who were hospitalized in our hospital were divided into suspension group and resection group (35 cases). The suspension group was treated with pelvic floor suspension, and the resection group was treated by transvaginal hysterectomy. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative catheterization, hospitalization days and postoperative 1 year recurrence rate in the suspension group were significantly better than those in the resection group. Conclusions Pelvic floor sling is more effective than vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of pelvic floor disease, which is worthy of clinical promotion.