关于研究范式问题,我以前想得不多,因为一直以为研究范式是“做出来”的,而不是“说出来”的。在我看来,祥龙教授很多意欲沟通中西思想的著作,就是相当可以为“范”之“式”。而当代中国学术研究中其他诸贤,也已经通过各自的研究工作而为我们提供了若干“范—式”。笔者自己之诸汉语拙作虽未能至,亦心向往之。窃谓学术研究中可以为“范”之“式”有大有小,故虽不能成其大者,成其小者亦不无裨益。但我应该参与谈 I did not think much about the research paradigm because I always thought that the research paradigm was “done ” rather than “spoken ”. In my opinion, many of Professor Xiang Long’s works that are intended to communicate the thoughts of China and the West are fairly “style” of “fan”. However, other mandarins in contemporary Chinese academic research have also provided us with a number of “paradigms” through their respective research work. Although the author’s own Chinese Zhuo did not reach, but also longing for. Stealing the academic research can be “Fan ” “style ” is big and small, so although it can not become the big person, into the smaller person is not without merit. But I should be involved