腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗结肠癌的临床效果对比

来源 :中国实用医药 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liminice
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨和分析腹腔镜和开腹手术在结肠癌患者临床治疗中的方法和效果。方法 70例结肠癌患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,各35例。实验组患者接受腹腔镜手术治疗,对照组患者接受开腹手术治疗,对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较和分析。结果经过系统的治疗和护理之后实验组患者肠道恢复时间为(2.1±0.5)d、住院时间(5.5±0.5)d、术中出血量(81±10)ml、镇痛时间(1.4±0.5)d;对照组患者肠道恢复时间为(3.2±0.2)d、住院时间(13.4±1.0)d、术中出血量(135±15)ml、镇痛时间(3.5±1.2)d。两组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗和开腹手术治疗相比较,接受前者治疗的安全性相对较高、患者术后恢复时间短、手术创伤较小、患者预后效果较为显著,其临床应用价值较大,值得在临床治疗中进行使用和推广。 Objective To investigate and analyze the method and effect of laparoscopic and laparotomy in the clinical treatment of patients with colon cancer. Methods Seventy patients with colon cancer were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 35 cases each. The patients in the experimental group received laparoscopic surgery and the control group received laparotomy. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results After the systematic treatment and nursing, the intestinal recovery time was (2.1 ± 0.5) days, the length of hospital stay (5.5 ± 0.5) days, the amount of blood loss (81 ± 10) ml, the analgesic time (1.4 ± 0.5) ) d. The control group had a recovery time of (3.2 ± 0.2) d, hospital stay (13.4 ± 1.0) d, blood loss (135 ± 15) ml and analgesic time (3.5 ± 1.2) d. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery is more safe in the treatment of the former. The patients have shorter postoperative recovery time and less trauma, and the prognosis of the patients is more obvious. It is worth more Clinical treatment for use and promotion.
其他文献
期刊
所谓规范性文件,是指没有立法权的地方政府依法制定的、在辖区内具有普遍约束力的公文,其宗旨在于保证法律法规和规章在辖区内的正确实施。因此,内容上的合法性、从属性和形
期刊
期刊
期刊
期刊
期刊
当井下发生火灾、瓦斯和煤尘爆炸、煤与瓦斯或二氧化碳突出等灾害时,井下人员应立即佩戴自救器脱险,免于中毒或窒息而死亡。自救器有过滤式和隔离式两种。过滤式自救器实际是
期刊
期刊