论文部分内容阅读
1980年9月29日,我国著名科学家钱学森在《文汇报》上发表文章,提出了社会科学技术与自然科学技术一样,“也是生产力”的见解。在钱老看,“我国没有把社会科学的研究放到应有的位置上来”,教训颇深,应当改。钱老后来又多次重申这一见解。很可惜,钱老的这一见解遭到了社会科学界某些同志的反对。他们认为,社会科学只能是社会意识形态,不能也是生产力。人们看到,当作为第一生产力的自然科学技术在我国大显身手的时候,社会科学研究在我国不少省区不太景气,钱少、人乱、心散,不少研究单位事实上名存实亡。
On September 29, 1980, Qian Xuesen, a famous Chinese scientist, published an article in Wen Wei Po and put forward the view that social science and technology, like natural science and technology, are “also productive forces.” Looking at Qian Lao, “China has not put the study of social science in its proper place.” There are profound lessons and should be changed. Qian then repeatedly reiterated this view. Unfortunately, this view of Qian Lao was opposed by some comrades in the social sciences. They think that social science can only be social ideology, can not be productive. People saw that when the natural science and technology as the primary productive forces play a significant role in our country, the social sciences research is not very prosperous in many provinces and autonomous regions in our country. With less money, people are chaotic and scattered, many research units actually exist in name only.