中国历代的律学家,对《唐律疏议》的评价是很高的,如清代励廷信、薛允升、以及清末的沈家本等。特别是沈氏,对之论证和赞扬则更为全面和突出。他在《寄簃文存》卷六《重刻唐律疏议序》里阐明了《唐律疏议》,至少有这样几点: 第一,论证了《唐律疏议》的问世,对司法刑审之理论与实践的特别重要性。他称赞《唐律疏议》所阐释的“律”为民命之所系,其义至精。所以主张吸取其精义,即穷其理以辩别案情真伪之端倪,公断无私心以避免主观妄判。沈氏还列举违背《唐律疏议》的律义必将出现冤假错案;司法人员假使不懂得通过调查彻底,只靠临时检举材料然办案,是根本不行的。 Chinese history of lawyers, “Tang law” is very high evaluation, such as the Qing Dynasty Li Ting letter, Xue Yunsheng, and the late Qing Dynasty Shen Jiaben. In particular, Shen’s argument and praise is more comprehensive and prominent. He clarified the “Tang law” in Volume Six of the Reciprocal Tang Lu Shujiu, which is at least sixfold: First, it demonstrates the advent of the “Tang law”, The Special Importance of Theory and Practice of Judicial Penalty. He commended the “law” explained by “Tang Law and Dispute Resolution” for the sake of the people, whose meaning is the essence. Therefore, advocating its essence, that is, the principle of discrimination to distinguish the authenticity of the clue, openly and unselfishly to avoid subjective judgments. Shen also cited violations of the “law of Tang law,” the law will inevitably miscarriage of justice; judicial personnel if you do not know thoroughly through the investigation, the temporary prosecution of materials by the case of handling cases, is simply not.