论文部分内容阅读
自带酒水到酒楼吃饭,结账时两百多元餐费里竟含百元酒水“开瓶费”。争论无果后,消费者愤而到法院起诉,质疑这一行业潜规则,舆论声讨也一浪高过一浪。前不久,北京海淀法院一审判决:自带酒水是消费者的权利;开瓶费属不当得利,酒楼应当返还。酒楼不服提起上诉,餐饮同业也竞相声援。一个司空见惯的现象一时间成为街谈巷议的热门话题,支持和反对者各持己见。在这种关注的背后,我们欣喜地看到大众法律意识的普遍增强。
Bring their own drinks to the restaurant to eat, checkout more than 200 yuan meal actually contain hundred yuan drinks “corkage fee.” After the debate was fruitless, consumers angrily went to the court to prosecute and questioned unspoken rules of the industry. Public opinion was also wave after wave. Not long ago, Beijing Haidian Court of First Instance ruling: bringing their own consumers is the right to drink; corkage is unjust enrichment, restaurants should be returned. Appeal restaurant dissatisfied with the restaurant industry, restaurants also competing for solidarity. A common phenomenon has become a hot topic in the streets for a time, with dissidents and dissidents alike. Behind this concern, we are delighted to see the general increase in public awareness of law.