20世纪初期,西方哲学发生了语言转向,很多哲学家在不同深度上意识到应当把实质研究与概念考察区分开来。在语言转向过程中,很多哲学家把概念考察理解为:所谓哲学问题,其实是语义问题。这样一来,大量甚至所有哲学问题,可以靠查字典加以解决,或最多是要求我们编一本更完备的字典。查尔默斯所引的威廉.詹姆斯就是一例。本文通过分析进一步指出,查尔默斯本人也仍然是在这个方向上来处理语词之争与实质之争的。本文则主张,我们应当把概念考察理解为反省、考察、延伸论理词所体现的一般道理。 At the beginning of the 20th century, Western philosophy developed its own language shift. Many philosophers, at different depths, realized that the substantive and conceptual studies should be distinguished from each other. In the process of language conversion, many philosophers understand the concept investigation as: the so-called philosophical problem is actually a semantic issue. In this way, many or all of the philosophical problems can be solved by searching the dictionary or, at best, asking us to compile a more complete dictionary. Chalmers quoted William James as an example. This paper further points out through analysis, Chalmers himself is still in this direction to deal with the word dispute and the essence of the dispute. This article argues that we should interpret the concept investigation as the general truth embodied by reflection, investigation and extension.