论文部分内容阅读
心电图是临床上常用的检查方法,而冠状动脉造影则是确诊冠心病的必需手段,但因后者系侵袭性操作,且价格偏贵,故在实际应用中有其局限性。如果能通过比较两种检查手段的最终检查结果,探寻两种检查方法的内在关联性,提高心电图的参考价值,以期用最简易的心电图检查为临床医生提供尽可能多的临床信息,则会为进一步制订治疗策略提供更多帮助,对临床工作大有裨益。而本综述正是以冠状动脉造影最终结果为依据,总结出心电图对心肌缺血定性、定位甚至定量方面的参考价值,为临床工作提供一定的帮助。
ECG is a commonly used method of clinical examination, and coronary angiography is the necessary means of diagnosis of coronary heart disease, but because of the latter invasive operation, and the price of your side, it has its limitations in practical applications. If you can compare the two final inspection results to explore the intrinsic relevance of the two test methods and improve the reference value of the ECG in order to use the most simple ECG to provide clinicians with as much clinical information as Further development of treatment strategies to provide more help, great clinical work. This review is based on the final results of coronary angiography, ECG concluded myocardial ischemia qualitative, location or even quantitative reference value for clinical work to provide some help.